- China’s Foreign Policy under Presid...
- Three Features in China’s Diplomati...
- The Contexts of and Roads towards t...
- Seeking for the International Relat...
- Solidarity with China against coron...
- Europe’s Pandemic Dilemma
- Donald Trump’s decision to halt US ...
- America Shoots Itself in the Foot
- China as COVID-19 scapegoat
- It Takes a Virus
- The Establishment of the Informal M...
- Opportunities and Challenges of Joi...
- Opportunities and Challenges of Joi...
- China’s Economic Initiatives in th...
- Commentary on The U. S. Arctic Coun...
- Perspective from China’s Internatio...
- “Polar Silk Road”and China-Nordic C...
- Overview of the 2016 Chinese G20 Pr...
- Promoting Peace Through Sustainable...
- Strategic Stability in Cyberspace: ...
- The Tragedy of Missed Opportunities
- Leading the Global Race to Zero Emi...
- Leading the Global Race to Zero Emi...
- Addressing the Vaccine Gap: Goal-ba...
- The EU and Huawei 5G technology aga...
- China's growing engagement with the...
- Perspectives on the Global Economic...
- International Cooperation for the C...
- Working Together with One Heart: P...
- THE ASIAN RESEARCH NETWORK: SURVEY ...
Dec 28 2016
Common but Differentiated Commitments: China's Engagement with the 2030 Agenda Global Partnership
By Zhagn Chun
Since the basic framework of the United Nations 2030 agenda for sustainable development goals (SDGs) was created, the focal point of relevant discussions has been shifted to global partnership and implementation. As a key component of this development initiative, global partnership has the potential to determine the means of implementation and follow-up implementation of the 2030 agenda, to which China is expected to make greater contributions. China's participation in global partnership will definitely generate benefits and incur costs. On one hand, the continuing rise of China could lead to future shrinkage of physical gains, leaving enormous potential for augmenting non-physical gains. On the other hand, the rest of the world expects China to contribute more global public goods in physical terms but not necessarily intellectual ones. With regard to cost-benefit balance, the costs of China's involvement in global partnership will be greater than the benefits it generates, while its non-physical gains will be hard to assess due to many uncertainties. For China, as a developing country, to contribute further to global partnership for the 2030 agenda, it should make clear strategic commitments on multilateral platforms, promise concrete material assistance at bilateral (collective) forums, and deepen its comprehensive domestic reforms.
Common but Differentiated Commitments: China's Engagement with the 2030 Agenda Global Partnership
Source of documents:《China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies》
more details: