- Jin Liangxiang
- Senior Research Fellow
- Center for west Asian & African Studies
- Institute for International Strategic Studies
- WHAT IF CLINTON WINS ——US President...
- How to Make a Truly Democratic and ...
- China can inject new dynamics into ...
- BRICS can lead Global South
- How G20 meeting could defuse world ...
- China’s Foreign Policy under Presid...
- Can China help shape global governa...
- Seeking for the International Relat...
- Beyond the Strategic Deterrence Nar...
- The Struggle for Brazil – And Again...
- Fostering the cross-border infrastr...
- Identifying and Addressing Major Is...
- Identifying and Addressing Major Is...
- Identifying and Addressing Major Is...
- The Establishment of the Informal M...
- Wuhan 2.0: a Chinese assessment
- Wuhan 2.0: a Chinese assessment
- The Future of China-India Relations
- The Russia-India-China Trio in the ...
- Chinese Perspective on Challenges f...
- G20 Development Agenda and 2030 Age...
- Coronavirus Battle in China: Proces...
- China’s Fight Against COVID-19 Epid...
- Revitalize China’s Economy:Winning ...
- International Cooperation for the C...
- Working Together with One Heart: P...
- The Tragedy of Missed Opportunities
- The Tragedy of More Missed Opportun...
- China-U.S. Collaboration --Four cas...
- Competition without Catastrophe : A...
August and September featured twin announcements by U.S. President Donald Trump proclaiming the normalization of relations between Israel and two Arab states — the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain.
But while the move was made in name of peace, it will instead create
instabilities in the region over the long term.
First, the foundations of the Palestine-Israel peace process will be
undermined. Various factors have stalled the peace process between Israel and
Palestine, but the primary one is Israel’s unwillingness to give up the
territories occupied by military force. As is widely known, various American
administrations have been either unwilling or unable to pressure Israel on this
point.
Although the peace process basically involves Palestine and Israel, the assent
of Arab countries as interested parties was always important. A majority of
Arab countries have refrained from formally recognizing and establishing
diplomatic relations with Israel, providing the only leverage available for
their little brother, Palestine, could take to the negotiating table.
For many years, this has been an explicit commitment by a majority of Arab
countries to the Palestinians. The Arab Initiative for peace, which was raised
by Saudi Arabia in 2002, clearly made the normalization of relations a
bargaining chip in demanding Israel’s withdrawal from occupied Palestinian
territories.
The UAE and Bahrain, in combination with Egypt and Jordan — which normalized
relations with Israel in 1979 and 1994, respectively — could lead to a collapse
of dominoes, with more Arab countries establishing relations with Israel.
Clearly, in this context, Palestine will face more difficulties in realizing
its legitimate rights of nationhood, since Israel will feel no pressure to find
political solutions.
Palestine’s right to nationhood is one of two sides of the peace process.
Palestinians’ anger over its legitimate rights not being respected, will always
be a factor that could lead to instability. It might be a joke that Palestine
could somehow threaten Israel’s security at the state level, but the
frustrations of Palestinians will always lead to more violence at the
grassroots level, and even spill over to other Arab countries. Frustration can be
contained for a time, but sooner or later it will burst out in a ferocious
manner.
Second, Trump’s move could undermine the domestic stability of some Arab
countries. While the U.S. administration is boasting of success in bridging
gaps between Israel and Arab countries, the Arab countries involved will have
to face pressure at home, which could easily engender turmoil, such as street
movements.
Marginalization is often used to describe the current status of the Palestine
issue, but no one denies that people of the Arab world and even the wider
Muslim world identify with Palestine’s cause of nationhood. They believe that
their Palestinian brothers should have a nation-state, and they support efforts
to achieve that goal.
Put another way, support for the Palestinian cause has always been one of the
major sources of political cohesion for Arab countries, whether republics or
monarchies. It is for this reason that a majority of Arab countries have
refrained from officially engaging with Israel. Reaching peace agreements with
Israel might enhance their relations with the United States, but will seriously
undermine their legitimacy among Arab countries.
It is less than 10 years since the Arab Spring of 2011. Since then, Arab
countries, including Gulf countries, have been working hard to reconstruct
their political houses through both talk and economic measures. This year,
particularly, is witnessing their struggle against the coronavirus and its
impact on their economies, which has already brought instability to the region,
imperiling people’s livelihoods.
The latest diplomatic move could pose another serious challenge for Arab
countries. The UAE is in a much better situation than most, as it has
constructed a diversified economy, while Bahrain could be in a more fragile
situation, as it has run out of oil reserves and its new economic foundation is
not yet built. With Sunni monarchy aligned with Saudi Arabia, Bahrain
especially has to face political pressure from its pro-Iran Shiite communities,
which represent two-thirds of its population. More Arab countries could sink
into a difficult situation if more of them decide to normalize relations with
Israel.
Third, Trump’s move will undermine international efforts to construct an
inclusive security framework in the Gulf region. The last decade saw growing
tensions between GCC countries and Iran and between the U.S. and Iran as well.
It is believed that an inclusive regional security structure featuring dialogue
is urgently needed in the Gulf to include regional countries and external
actors. It is believed that Iran should be brought into the tent instead of
being kept out. That should be the inevitable choice.
For this purpose, Chinese officials have laid out the country’s position on
maintaining security in the Gulf region on many occasions. For instance, State
Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi discussed a three-point proposal on
security building in the Gulf region on Sept. 4. China believes that regional
issues should be decided by countries in the region via dialogue, and that
external actors should push for such efforts rather than alienating those
countries.
In September last year, Russia proposed an initiative for constructing an
inclusive mechanism in the region that would bring major regional and external
actors together. It was supported by China immediately. The European Union is
also a major external actor with normal relations with both GCC countries and
Iran, and it also supports dialogue between Iran and GCC countries.
Unfortunately, Trump’s new move is pushing the region in the opposite
direction. As observed, by pressuring Arab countries to normalize relations
with Israel, Trump is materializing his so-called new Middle East plan to build
an alliance between Arab countries and Israel to contain Iran. That is just the
opposite of bringing all of them together with external stake holders.
The U.S. move will also further increase hostility between Iran and Arab
countries and widen the understanding gap between them. Just imagine, without
Iran being included — and Iran being regarded as the target of security
arrangements — how can any endeavor for security be sustainable?
All in all, Trump’s latest move in pushing some Arab countries to normalize
relations with Israel, though in name of peace, will not serve for building
peace in the region at all. These moves will undermine the Palestine-Israel
peace process, the domestic stability of Arab countries and international
efforts to build a security mechanism in the Gulf region. They could even have
a long-term negative impact, as they create uncertainties over the destiny of
Palestine as a sovereign state.
Source of documents:China US Focus, Sept. 25, 2020