On April 14, President Hu Jintao will meet with Brazilian President DilmaRousseff, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, Indian Prime Minister ManmohanSingh and South African President Jacob Zuma. The third formal meeting ofBRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) includes South Africa for the first time.

In the past, the advanced economies empowered the world economy. Today, it is the large emerging economies that drive global growth. In the emerging world, the future is a source of hope and optimism. In the advanced world, it is now often a cause for ambivalence and resignation. In the long run, however, the rise of the large emerging economies is vital to global peace and prosperity.

The concept of the “BRIC” was developed in the early 2000s by Jim O’Neill, then global economist of Goldman Sachs. At the time, these four economies were less than 15 percent of the G6 (the United States, Japan, Germany, France, the United Kingdom and Italy) in US dollar terms. Yet projections indicated that by the early 2040s the BRIC economies could be larger than the G6. Of course, nothing is inevitable in history. As a group, however, BRIC has emerged from the global credit crisis better than the major economies. As a result, the BRIC economies could become as big as G7 by the early 2030s.

In the early 2000s, Goldman Sachs projected that China’s total GDP would catch up with that of the US by 2042. After the past decade and the global financial crisis, however, the pace of transition has accelerated. Now it appears that China’s GDP may match that of the US by the early 2020s.

The global crisis and the debt burden of the advanced economies will tax their growth for years to come, whereas the BRIC economies may grow twice as fast. And these large emerging economies are followed by “mini-BRICs,” including Indonesia and the Philippines, and Egypt, Turkey, Vietnam and Nigeria.

A strong BRIC growth does not require “economic miracles”. But it does presume macroeconomic stability, relatively high investment rates and trade openness, increasing technological capabilities, growing emphasis on human capital, and political stability.

Now Africa has a representative in the BRIC alignment. In the future, some North African and the Middle Eastern countries, too, may join the BRIC league. In the postwar era, Egypt, led by Gamal Abdel Nasser, emerged as the leader of the Arab world. During the past three decades, however, the gains of globalization have largely bypassed Egypt and its 80 million people despite the great economic potential. In 1980, Egypt on average was almost 65 percent more prosperous than China. Last year, the Chinese were 15 percent more prosperous than the Egyptians, at purchasing power parity.

One of the most remarkable aspects of the rise of the BRIC economies is the severed tie between total GDP and per capita GDP, that is, the economic power of nations and the average prosperity of their citizens. In the past, the two used to go hand in hand. In the future, that will no longer be the case.

In the 19th century, Britain was the growth engine of the world, and Britons had a relatively high per capita GDP. In the postwar era, the US was the strongest nation, while Americans were the most prosperous people on average. As global growth will be driven by the BRIC economies, the most powerful countries will no longer be the most prosperous ones.

As long as growth can be sustained in the advanced and emerging economies, all nations can benefit. That is the win-win story. But for that, we need a globalization that is more inclusive in kind.

Economically, the epicenter of the global crisis was the financial sector in the West. In the future, it should pay for excessive risk taking. In the absence of appropriate financial sector reforms, the great global recession would only be a prelude to the next one. Strategically, the postwar multilateral institutions — as forums of global cooperation — must reflect on the proportionate role of BRIC economies, especially in the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Since 2005, the advanced economies have urged China to become a “responsible stakeholder” in the international community. But if the multilateral institutions of the international community do not reflect the proportionate economic share and political voice of the large emerging economies, they can hardly be considered “responsible”.

Under unchanged policies, the IMF says the net debt-to-GDP ratio of the G7 economies would exceed 440 percent by 2050. Does that reflect responsible leadership?

In the West, the rise of the BRIC economies is occasionally said to be a threat to market economy. Yet the reality is the opposite. A decade ago, about 80 percent of Americans saw the free market as the best economic system for the future. After the global financial crisis, this support has plummeted to 59 percent, according to GlobeScan. In China and Brazil, the corresponding support is 67 percent. In India, it’s about the same as in the US.

In the coming years, the economic rise of BRICS will gradually translate to increasing political power, which will not minimize the value of other multilateral forums. It will only highlight the importance of new forums.

Until recently, the world was led by the multilateralism of the few in the West. In the future, it will be led by more inclusive multilateralism of the many — in the West and the East both

Source of documents：